in the last hours They accepted the guardianship against J Balvin for one of his songs before the Council of State and will have to provide evidence in his defense.
A great stir arose in Colombia and some other countries for the video of the song that the paisa released a few weeks ago. Although reggaeton is the genre that commands the stop, there are those who oppose the lyrics and themes that are represented in some videos.
Within the controversy over the song Bitch, Vice President Marta Lucía Ramírez also entered, who rejected J Balvin’s song by means of a letter. Based on criticism from personalities and entities in the country, it became known of an action filed with the Third Section of the Council of State against the singer.
They accepted guardianship against J Balvin and now he will have to answer
A citizen identified as Leonardo Santo Petro filed the action. This is intended to protect the fundamental rights of this population and women, according to the newspaper The viewer. The rights claimed by Santo Petro are “The right to equality, to non-discrimination, to a good name and honor, to the dignity of the black and Afro-descendant communities of Colombia, the dignity of women in general”as he knew The country, middle of Cali.
According to the guardianship filed, José Álvaro Osorio, the singer’s real name, would have incurred these faults:
“It uses terms or words directly and openly humiliating, sexist, racist, sexist, misogynist and against the dignity of the human person of women, which greatly violates the rights of women by comparing them to a dog, an animal that according to the content of the song must be dominated and mistreated”.
The action was also filed against the Presidency of the Republic, the Legal Commission for the Protection of Black Communities or Afro-Colombian Population of Congress, the Presidential Council for Women’s Equity and the Ministry of Culture, since they would have incurred a “Omissive conduct in the fulfillment of their legal and constitutional duties”.
It should be noted that J Balvin had apologized at the time after the criticism of his song. Days later, YouTube removed the video from the platform and only allows you to listen to the song. The paisa artist has already been notified of this action and it is expected that he will soon provide some evidence in his favor before the Council of State.
Do you agree with this action against the song Bitch and the singer J Balvin? Give us your answer in a comment to this post and do not forget to share our notes on your social networks.